Chapter 2
Understanding the Bitcoin network
In this article we explain you the dual nature of Bitcoin as an asset and as a network, and how that network operates to process and record transactions.
9 minutes|Published 2024-04-05
Chapter 2
In this article we explain you the dual nature of Bitcoin as an asset and as a network, and how that network operates to process and record transactions.
9 minutes|Published 2024-04-05
Bitcoin is both an asset and a network, which operates as a decentralized ledger that keeps track of bitcoin balances. When a user sends bitcoins, a transaction is submitted to full nodes who verify that it respects the network's rules. It is then forwarded to a pool of pending transactions that miners pick up to create blocks. Miners then compete with each other to add blocks to the ledger, a computing work for which the winner is rewarded.
Full nodes are participants of the Bitcoin network, whose tasks are to store a complete copy of the Bitcoin ledger and to verify each new transaction being submitted to the network. Full nodes are not rewarded with BTC.
Miners are participants of the Bitcoin network whose role is to add new blocks of transactions to the Bitcoin ledger through Proof-of-Work, for which they are rewarded with BTC.
Proof-of-Work is the name of the consensus mechanism used by Bitcoin, a system that requires to solve complex computing problems to verify and add blocks of transactions to the blockchain.
What is Bitcoin? What seems like an easy question turns out to be a tough nut to crack. While the philosophical side of this question will always remain open to debate (although we proposed a detailed answer in the previous chapter), the technical side is simpler to tackle. That's what we will cover in this article: what is the Bitcoin network and how does it work.
As a starting point, we can say that Bitcoin is a global ledger: a database that keeps track of balances, or in other words how many units of Bitcoin everybody owns.
These units are issued by the Bitcoin protocol itself, which is code that lives online among the participants of the Bitcoin network. There is no centralized entity that issues Bitcoin, controls it or updates its ledger, Bitcoin is entirely decentralized.
Bitcoin is a digital record of transactions that is shared globally among a large number of network participants. As such, Bitcoin's ledger does not only exist once but thousands of times as identical, continuously updated copies that are stored by those participants.
You probably think that bitcoins can be sent and received within that network, but nothing actually moves. When bitcoins are "sent" or "received", all that is happening is an update made to Bitcoin's distributed and globally synchronized ledger. When a transaction is made, the units being transferred are simply removed from the sender's balance and added to the receiver's balance.
Owning a Bitcoin balance, which is called a public key, is done by knowing its corresponding private key. Bitcoin units that are associated with a private key at any point in time can be "unlocked" or "spent" by using the public and the private key together to create a unique digital signature that will indicate to the Bitcoin ledger that units are to be credited to a designated public key address.
So, when Bitcoin units are spent or received, what happens is simply an update of the Bitcoin ledger stating that the respective units have changed hands and are now linked to a new public address.
With this first overview in mind, we can already summarize that Bitcoin is a digitally distributed ledger making up a global network that has its own native asset.
It is worth noting that Bitcoin with a capital letter B is referring to the network itself, while bitcoin with a lower-case letter b is referring to the asset. Therefore, we can say that Bitcoin is a database, a transaction network and an asset all at the same time.
Bitcoin is often compared to traditional payment infrastructures like PayPal or Visa. While there are some similarities, the comparison is fundamentally flawed. It's true that Bitcoin is a network just like Visa or PayPal, but unlike them the Bitcoin network carries its own native asset, while Visa / PayPal rely on the US dollar - a money surrogate - to act as the unit of value within their own network.
To continue the comparison, neither PayPal's nor Visa's ledger is distributed. Their database is controlled and managed by the companies themselves, while Bitcoin's ledger is truly decentralized with no single entity having the power to exercise control over it.
These differences may be subtle to the casual observer, but they are important in the grand scheme of things. Bitcoin's anonymous founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, chose the terms wisely and carefully: In his white paper, he indeed described Bitcoin as a peer to peer electronic cash system.
In hindsight, he probably should have highlighted the term “cash” as it carries a precise meaning and purports to a distinct aspect within monetary theory: cash is defined as a base money, referring typically to a network's native asset.
Bitcoin being introduced as a cash system reinforces its fundamental difference to payment networks like PayPal or Visa that should correctly be labeled currency networks, as they handle a money surrogate and not the base money itself.
Because Bitcoin has been designed as a cash system with its own native base asset, it can be compelling to liken bitcoin the asset to something like gold, as the precious metal is also a base asset. However, the comparison ends to the fact that gold does not have its own inherent transaction network.
Therefore, bitcoin is a base asset as well as the native asset of the Bitcoin network.
With these defining features, Bitcoin can be considered a synthesis combining the best of all worlds. In that way, some people refer to bitcoin as pieces of super-gold flying inside an unstoppable PayPal.
We now understand that Bitcoin is a gold-type of money that lives in its own ledger-based transaction network. But if no one controls that network, how does it record transactions correctly and keep a clean accounting? Instead of a single entity doing that job, a multitude of network participants act as decentralized bookkeepers.
The first and most famous category of participants in the Bitcoin network are the miners. Their role is to aggregate new transactions that full nodes submit to the Bitcoin network into blocks, and add them to the Bitcoin blockchain (or in other words the network's transaction history).
They ensure that way that the distributed ledger is constantly maintained and that transactions are continuously executed. Without miners, no transactions would be processed on the Bitcoin network.
Besides the miners, the full nodes is another category of network participants that is of utmost importance to the Bitcoin network.
Their task is to verify and validate each new transaction that enters the Bitcoin network. They check them against the network's rules, and discard them in case of contradiction or add them to what is called the mempool if they check out. The mempool stores pending transactions that have been validated by full nodes, which miners then pick up to be executed and irrevocably added to the blockchain.
As their name suggests, light nodes are a simplified version of full nodes. While each full node keeps a complete version of the Bitcoin blockchain, light nodes only store a lightweight version of the ledger. They allow anyone to verify Bitcoin transactions without the heavy resources required by full nodes.
A simple illustration of the Bitcoin network.
If miners and nodes are the decentralized bookkeepers of the Bitcoin network, how is it ensured that their job is done correctly? And what incentivizes them to do that accounting job?
That's when the consensus mechanism of the blockchain comes into play, a system called Proof-of-Work in the case of Bitcoin.
That mechanism basically involves the different network participants in verification tasks of each other's work to ensure that everyone follows the rules.
As explained earlier, nodes receive transactions submitted by Bitcoin users and check that they comply with the network's rules.
Once done, miners are in competition with each other to take each new block of transaction and add it to the blockchain. This competition takes the form of a complex mathematical problem that miners try to solve using dedicated computer hardware. The first one to solve it gets to process the block, broadcast it to the all the other miners who will check again that the solution is correct, and get the reward associated with it.
The reward for this work and the energy expenditure that miners put up consists of a block subsidy and transaction fees. The block subsidy is a predefined amount of BTC for each block that a miner manages to add to the blockchain. Additionally, the miner of a block gets all the fees paid by the users who made transactions in that block. That's how a miner gets paid for his decentralized book-keeping work.
What about full nodes? In fact, they are not paid at all. In contrast to miners, the work they perform is not costly at all. Validating transactions is a comparatively light task and can be done on most regular computers.
However, full nodes get the benefit of being kind of like first-class citizens within the Bitcoin network. As they are the ones validating the blocks and transactions, they don't have to trust other participants but can directly verify everything that happens on the ledger themselves. This is a desired feature, which is why full nodes are run by miners as well as Bitcoin users alike, who all get active in enforcing the Bitcoin network's consensus rules, increasing that way the network's security and quality.
You now understand what is Bitcoin and how its network operates, the next chapter will dive into the detail of how Bitcoin transactions work.
Subscribe to our newsletter and get the next chapters delivered straight to your mailbox.
Subscribe
